Does the structure move from known to unknown? Is literature synthesized rather than summarized? Are the RQs a natural result of the lit review?
Is it clear why (or how) each study cited is relevant to the current project?
Is the current study present throughout the literature review? Does the lit review identify gaps or disagreements in current knowledge and make a strong case for what the current study is contributing?
Is it clearly written (free from typographical and grammatical errors, poor word choice, overly long sentences, and awkward phrasing)?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment